Team Focus - Come On In And Enjoy The Company! Home 
How To's Create A Ride TF Guest Map TF Merchandise TF Members Rides TF Toolbar Download Register

 Moderated by: SyntheticShield, Chelly03PZEV
New Topic Reply Print
Amsoil Series 2000 0w-30 Oil Analysis - AMSOIL Corner - General Information - Team Focus - Come On In And Enjoy The Company!

 Not logged in  
 Login
 Register
 Home
 Calendar
 Members
 Help

Search
Search
Search by username

Recent Topics


AuthorPost
AZMike
TF Family Member
 

Joined: Sat Nov 26th, 2005
Location: Sacramento, California USA
Posts: 3
Year/Model: 
Occupation: 
Interests: 
Male/Female: 
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Sun Nov 27th, 2005 02:37 am
QuoteReply
Stole this oil analysis report from Bobistheoilguy to use as my first post. :D

Looks like Amsoil has been tweaking their Series 2000 chemistry again...but this certainly isn't a GF-4 formulation based upon the Zn and P levels.

2005 Mustang GT
4.6L V8, 3V
6664 miles on the oil, 4 months
12859 total miles
Amsoil SDF11 Oil Filter w/magnet
10 mi daily commute @50MPH, with moderately hard driving

Al 2
Cr 1
Fe 26
Cu 57
Pb 1
Mo 28
Ni 1
Mn 13
B 29
Si 18
Na 4
Mg 707
P 828
Zn 1031

SUS Viscosity @ 210F= 64.8- equivalent to 11.5cst, little change from the 11.2 cst baseline...showing that this report breaks the rule that domestic V8s emit large amounts of contamination, causing excessive thickening...guess this new Ford V8 produces little contamination.

Flashpoint= 380F

Fuel= <0.5

Water, Antifreeze=both negative

Insolubles= 0.1%

TBN= 5.7- excellent by Blackstone's method...note that this is equivalent to a 7.5-8.0 on Oil Analyzer's scale...interesting how OAI's TBN readings always read 2-2.5pts higher than Blackstone's readings even though they're both supposed to be using the same ASTM D-4739 method.

Iron and Copper will drop as wear-in proceeds, the Ni is possibly from an intake leak and the Mn could be fuel additives burning past rings that haven't seated. The high Silicon is from gasket leaching, but possibly from an air filter leak as well. The Iron should eventually drop to 2ppm/1000 miles or so.

I'm interested in seeing how well the ATM 10w-30 would perform here for less $$$, as I personally think that it will deliver the same results while saving $14/oil change. The new ATM is formulated at 10.6cst now meeting the A5/B5 specs, so its HT/HS is only 3.2cp. Note: The Series 2000 0w-30 is also reformulated now in the mid 10cst range, and its HT/HS is now 3.3cp, VI 187, and Volatility 6.7%, thus it is no longer an A3/B3 lube. The Series 2000 used in this report was of the pre-A5/B5 formulation.

This is an excellent forum and I hope to come by the Amsoil section from time to time as I'm especially interested in the Series 2000 0w-30 oil analysis results, even though I'm not an Amsoil dealer and simply an enthusiast.

Last edited on Wed Nov 30th, 2005 06:04 am by AZMike

Back To Top QuoteReply

SyntheticShield
TF Moderator
 

Joined: Tue May 25th, 2004
Location: Bartlesville, Oklahoma USA
Posts: 885
Year/Model: 2001 Pont. Grand Prix GTP ...
Occupation: Telecommunications
Interests: Storm chasing/Photography
Male/Female: Male
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Mon Nov 28th, 2005 01:31 pm
QuoteReply
Hey there AZMike.  Welcome to the board and definately thanks for the oil analysis.

Interesting report to say the least.  Copper and Iron seem high, but as stated your motor is still breaking in as well and should level out over time.  What kind of magnet are you using on the oil filter?  It would be interesting to see a report without the magnet to see what kind of effect it is having.

I will give your report this, the Viscosity seems to be more stable than from my experience in the past.  Though I still say that despite the Series 2000's billing from Amsoil that thier Series 3000 is a better oil.

On the TBN, I posted an analysis here on a 2001 Mustang GT with mileage very close to your and the TBN was within a few tenths of what yours is.  If I remember the guidelines for the margin of error for test results it was on the order of 15%.  To clarify that, the margin of errors was from two different labs running the same tests.  They also have guidelines for two different people in the same lab running the same test, so there is some allowance there.

There was some news somewhere I read or heard from Amsoil, dont remember which, but they are/were supposed to tweak the Series 2000 a bit because of the thickening issue it had.  The Series 3000 is the same cost but has shown to be a much more stable oil.

Thanks for posting the results, hope you come back and visit soon.



____________________
My car is a synner! It uses Amsoil Synthetic Lubricants.
2001 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP
It whines a lot, but I like it
Back To Top QuoteReply

Chelly03PZEV
TF Administrator


Joined: Wed May 26th, 2004
Location: Always On The Ocean, Maine USA
Posts: 3590
Year/Model: 2003 2.3 PZEV ...
Occupation: Broadband Technical Support Rep
Interests: Focus & Cars in General - Dogs (animals) - many ...
Male/Female: Female
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Mon Nov 28th, 2005 03:12 pm
QuoteReply
excellent info on the Series 2000.

I've chosen to change out from the series 2000 to the series 3000 when due in January.  I've not had any problems w/ my car running the series 2000, but then again, I've failed at obtaining oil samples to run the tests I'd like.  Dan has been forgetting my kits in the glovebox each time.

Hopefully I'll have good news when I do change over and have this test done on a full year's run on the series 2000.  It will be well into the 20,000 mile mark when I finally do.



____________________
Get in, Sit down, Shut up and HANG ON!
Back To Top QuoteReply

SyntheticShield
TF Moderator
 

Joined: Tue May 25th, 2004
Location: Bartlesville, Oklahoma USA
Posts: 885
Year/Model: 2001 Pont. Grand Prix GTP ...
Occupation: Telecommunications
Interests: Storm chasing/Photography
Male/Female: Male
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Tue Nov 29th, 2005 02:32 pm
QuoteReply
That should be an interesting result.  I would love to see that when you get it after it having 20k miles on it.



____________________
My car is a synner! It uses Amsoil Synthetic Lubricants.
2001 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP
It whines a lot, but I like it
Back To Top QuoteReply

AZMike
TF Family Member
 

Joined: Sat Nov 26th, 2005
Location: Sacramento, California USA
Posts: 3
Year/Model: 
Occupation: 
Interests: 
Male/Female: 
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Wed Nov 30th, 2005 05:59 am
QuoteReply
SS, thanks for the reply and welcome. No this isn't my car, I wish. :D I just stole the report from Bobistheoilguy.

I was personally quite surprised as well by the stable viscosity of the Series 2000, I was expecting it to be in the low 12 range by now due to the heavy contamination that is usually generated by V8 engines, either this engine runs very clean (possible) or they've tweaked the Series 2000 formulation. I personally think that this engine burns quite clean, as I've seen this same formula used a 4-cyl Honda with 60K for 13000 miles and the oil became a 15w-40, though wear was almost non-existent.

SS, there is certainly significant variation beyond 15% with TBN values with OAI and Blackstone, despite using the same method...dunno why...perhaps you can do a blind test for us next time and send a sample to each lab???

Series 3000 is too thick for any high-performance app with a HT/HS of 3.6cp, many times the kinetic viscosity of the oil does not necessairly correlate well to actual wear thus the introduction of the HT/HS test, where oil is heated to 150C and sheared many times to reveal the true vis...I'd personally be interested in seeing the ATM 10w-30 in this app or even the ACD 10w-30, as the ACD has no polymer thickeners if you look closely at the VI, Volatility, and HT/HS...so its completely shear stable.

BTW, I added you to my AIM buddy list but I don't see you online.

Mike
SyntheticShield wrote:
Hey there AZMike.  Welcome to the board and definately thanks for the oil analysis.

Interesting report to say the least.  Copper and Iron seem high, but as stated your motor is still breaking in as well and should level out over time.  What kind of magnet are you using on the oil filter?  It would be interesting to see a report without the magnet to see what kind of effect it is having.

I will give your report this, the Viscosity seems to be more stable than from my experience in the past.  Though I still say that despite the Series 2000's billing from Amsoil that thier Series 3000 is a better oil.

On the TBN, I posted an analysis here on a 2001 Mustang GT with mileage very close to your and the TBN was within a few tenths of what yours is.  If I remember the guidelines for the margin of error for test results it was on the order of 15%.  To clarify that, the margin of errors was from two different labs running the same tests.  They also have guidelines for two different people in the same lab running the same test, so there is some allowance there.

There was some news somewhere I read or heard from Amsoil, dont remember which, but they are/were supposed to tweak the Series 2000 a bit because of the thickening issue it had.  The Series 3000 is the same cost but has shown to be a much more stable oil.

Thanks for posting the results, hope you come back and visit soon.

Back To Top QuoteReply

SyntheticShield
TF Moderator
 

Joined: Tue May 25th, 2004
Location: Bartlesville, Oklahoma USA
Posts: 885
Year/Model: 2001 Pont. Grand Prix GTP ...
Occupation: Telecommunications
Interests: Storm chasing/Photography
Male/Female: Male
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Wed Nov 30th, 2005 03:50 pm
QuoteReply
I will say that I believe the Mustang GT motor, 4.6L, does burns quite clean.  When my friend told me he had the mileage he did on the oil I figured it would be turning colors at that time.  However it was just as clean looking as the day it was poured in and I know 'cause I poured it in LOL.  So its probably the fact that the 4.6L motor is a good motor.

I have many times thought about sending a sample to both OAI and Blackstone for quite sometime just to see what the difference would be.  I agree 15% is significant as well sometimes it seems even greater than that.  Its not variances in the test as the test follows a standardized proceedure, its the interpertive results that vary.  The results of the test are most likely pretty identical from one lab to the next, but the guy looking at the results and interpreting the numbers may see something differently that the next person, so I believe that is where most of the variance is not in the test itself.  I think on BITOG they have before sent in samples to different labs before, though I dont know if they were sent to OAI and Blackstone at the same time.

You sound like you are pretty darn well versed in lubrication, you work in the field or just BITOG educated :), either one is good.  I frequent BITOG and read a lot though I dont post all that often.

Oh, by the way, Im running ATM in my current vehicle since it called for a 10W30 and should have some test results this week, at least I hope so.  OAI seems to move at a snails pace at times.

Im usually on AIM at work, but not on all that much at home.  You can always email me and tell me you're on and I can hop on and we can chat a bit.  Take care.



____________________
My car is a synner! It uses Amsoil Synthetic Lubricants.
2001 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP
It whines a lot, but I like it
Back To Top QuoteReply

Current time is 10:32 am
Team Focus - Come On In And Enjoy The Company! > General Information > AMSOIL Corner > Amsoil Series 2000 0w-30 Oil Analysis


Arctic2 theme designed by: The Cat Dragged Inn
Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.2252 seconds (14% database + 86% PHP). 19 queries executed.